1) In those days
Mattathias, son of John, son of Simeon, a priest of the family of Joarib, left Jerusalem and settled in Modein.
Modein is his ancestral home, around twenty miles north of Jerusalem.
2) He had five sons: John, who was called Gaddi;
Apparently all of these nicknames have significance, so I will try to
track them down. It can either mean “My
Troop” or “Kid Goat.” I think the former
is probably the intention, consider the militant nature of this family.
3) Simon, who was called Thassi;
Thassi most probably means “Guide” or “Director”. You will notice that later he’s looked to for
4) Judas, who was called Maccabeus;
As we mentioned before, his nickname means “Hammer”.
5) Eleazar, who was called Avaran; and Jonathan, who was
Avaran might mean “Piercer” and refer to an incident later where Eleazar
stabs an elephant. Apphus might mean
“Dissembler”, but it might have begun with any of several unwritten consonants
that would have changed the meaning—or so my sources say, not wanting to admit
that a Biblical Hero might be known as Jonathan the Liar. I wish this text had no greater problem than
This is probably a good point to mention that the Bible is full of highly
fallible people, and the Deuterocanonical Books are no exception. Just because somebody in the Bible does
something doesn’t make it right.
6) When he saw the sacrileges that were
being committed in Judah and in Jerusalem, 7) he
“Woe is me! Why was I born
to see the ruin of my
the ruin of the holy city—
To dwell there
as it was given into the
hands of enemies,
the sanctuary into the
hands of strangers?
8) Her temple has become like a man disgraced,
9) her glorious vessels carried off as spoils,
Her infants murdered in
youths by the sword of the enemy.
10) What nation has not taken its share of her realm,
and laid its hand on her
11) All her adornment has been taken away.
Once free, she has become
12) We see our sanctuary laid waste,
our beauty, our glory.
The Gentiles have defiled
13) Why are we still alive?”
COMMENTARY: More classic Jewish-style poetry translated
into the Greek, a lyrical lament summing up the grief from the last chapter. I feel for that last line—sometimes such
terrible things happen that you wonder why the shock didn’t kill you. How is it that you can go about your daily
business as though nothing had happened?
Why didn’t your heart just stop?
14) Then Mattathias and his sons tore their garments, put
on sackcloth, and mourned bitterly.
Garment-tearing is a standard part of the Jewish mourning ritual. Some prudently aim for seams so that the
garment can easily be sewn back again.
Others go at it with abandon, and hang the cost; grief matters more than
a shirt. In this case Mattathias mourns
for all of the slaughtered.
Sackcloth, as we mentioned before, signifies
penitence, in this case for the sins that brought Jerusalem to this pass. Once you’ve finished wrecking your clothing,
you need to put something on in its place, of course, but nobody’s in the mood
for fine garments, and anyway, why not kill two birds with one stone and mix
mourning with penance?
15) The officers of
the king in charge of enforcing the apostasy came to the city of Modein to make
The enforcement starts to spread beyond Jerusalem to the nearby
villages. Having made an example of
Judea’s most important city, they don’t expect much resistance.
16) Many of Israel joined them, but Mattathias and his
sons drew together.
Some were already inclined that way, and some intimidated into it.
17) Then the officers of the king addressed Mattathias:
“You are a leader, an honorable and great man in this city, supported by sons
If the officers can win over this influential man, they can get this
done without bloodshed.
18) Come now, be the first to obey the
king’s command, as all the Gentiles and Judeans and those who are left in
Jerusalem have done. Then you and your sons shall be numbered among the King’s
Friends, and you and your sons
shall be honored with silver and gold and many gifts.”
“King’s Friends” was a kind of order of knighthood or nobility, based on
Alexander’s Companions. Aristotle had
not tutored Alexander all by himself, but thought it best to have other boys
and teens study with him, so together they learned statesmanship, strategy,
philosophy, and everything else necessary for leadership. So by the time his boyhood friends reached
adulthood they were all qualified officers and advisors, as well as intimates
who understood Alexander’s mind and intentions with little needed said. Subsequent rulers, throughout history, have
tried to imitate having a similar order of King’s Friends, but they never quite
duplicated the chemistry between these men who grew up with each other, or had
a teacher like Aristotle.
19) But Mattathias answered in a loud voice: “Although all
the Gentiles in the king’s realm obey him, so that they forsake the religion of
their ancestors and consent to the king’s orders, 20) yet I and my sons and my kindred will
keep to the covenant of our ancestors.
The Jews were not the only people assimilated into the invader’s
religion. Interestingly, Mattathias
considers them shameful for not following their own gods; he’s not out to
convert people of other heritage to his own people’s ways. People thought of ethnicity and religion as
pretty much synonymous in those days.
When you converted to a different religion, you left behind your old
family for a new one.
Christianity shook up that model and introduced the concept of evangelism to
the Middle East, Europe, and Africa, where it had previously been unknown. (Buddhist evangelism does predate it, mostly
influencing Asia.) The word “catholic”
in the phrase from the Nicene Creed: “holy,
catholic, and apostolic church” means “universal, which means for anyone of any
A curious deliberate mistranslation might have shifted this evangelism from
peaceable to forcible. It seemed
harmless enough, at first glance, to translate references to vultures into
references to eagles, and vice versa.
Romans liked eagles and hated vultures.
They didn’t want to hear psalms singing, “And I will raise you up on
The problem with that was that, in the Middle
East and North Africa, vultures are symbols of mercy—the carnivore who refuses
to kill. In Rome, eagles are symbols of
conquest—the mightiest bird known to them, flying high above all others. Little things like this can make a big
difference in people’s unconscious mindset. “Spreading the Good News” became less and less
an offer of mercy and more and more an ultimatum at sword-point.
The Catholic Church has, since then, confessed
as a sin and repented all evangelism-by-force.
This matters in considering the rest of this chapter.
21) Heaven forbid that we should forsake
the law and the commandments. 22) We
will not obey the words of the king by departing from our religion in the
As you will see they will later have to pick and choose which customs to
depart from in order to survive. Some of
their choices might startle you, with odd priorities. But in each case they decide based on
whatever’s most likely to keep their culture alive.
23) As he finished saying these words, a
certain Jew came forward in the sight of all to offer sacrifice on the altar in
Modein according to the king’s order.
Maybe he was terrified and wanted to avert a massacre. Maybe he wanted all of that treasure and the
name of King’s Friend. We don’t know for
sure. But we can find a clue as to at
least partial motives in him by how the writer names him—or rather doesn’t name
him. To call him “a certain Jew” instead
of just “a Jew” indicates that the writer knew exactly who he was talking about
and refused to name him by choice.
This has a precedent. On the same day
that Alexander the Great was born, “a certain Greek” burned down the Temple of
Artemis, declaring to all who would listen that this act would secure his
position in history. Instead, , all who
recorded the incident refused to preserve his name. From this we might conclude that “a certain
Jew” was an ambitious or vain person, either a celebrity or a celebrity-wannabe
enamored of becoming a King’s Friend, who’d very much want known, punished for
posterity by having his identity blotted from the record.
24) When Mattathias saw him, he was filled
with zeal; his heart was moved and his just fury was aroused; he sprang forward
and killed him upon the altar.
Okay, I have a hard time with that.
I do NOT believe in killing people for making religious choices
different from my own.
But if this man was indeed ambitious, Mattathias probably saw his sacrifice as
a public declaration of an intention to betray his people and cause much
bloodshed, aiding the conqueror and informing on anyone who resisted, thereby
amassing fame, wealth and power for himself.
So the more I think about it, the more I see this as a defensive strike
against somebody who exposed bad intentions.
What I really have a hard time with is the historical precedent that this set,
when taken at face value. Way too many
people have died over the years because others could call it “my just fury” to
kill them for believing something other than the local standard.
25) At the same time, he also killed the
messenger of the king who was forcing them to sacrifice, and he tore down the
Right. Kill the messenger. Except that this messenger came with the
power to have others killed, so I can understand that.
26) Thus he showed his zeal for the law,
just as Phinehas did with Zimri, son of Salu.
Now this justification REALLY makes me squirm. Earlier in the Bible a man named Phinehas saw
a Jew married to a Canaanite and went into a rage and killed him. Modern times have seen the rise of a violent
racist group called “The Priesthood of Phinehas”, which has been known to kill
multiracials and people in mixed-race marriages, and they scare me more than
the Ku Klux Klan or the Neonazis or any of the rest of them, because I am precisely
the sort of person they would murder if they got the chance. I don’t like the idea of anybody emulating
But I’m not here to gloss over the parts I
don’t like. That’s dishonest. If I disagree I’ll say so, and sometimes,
like right now, I’ll say so loudly. But
I won’t conceal or try to rationalize any part away.
I will say that those were barbaric times, all over the world, among all
peoples. Our understanding of God’s will
lives and grows over time. Jews have
developed the Talmud and other great works of scholarship to reflect an
evolving understanding; no sane Jew would justify murdering an apostate today. Nor can Christians deny religious evolution,
as we have founded our faith on an innovation that separated it from traditions
that went before. And we Catholics have
a Pope to make rulings on evolving faith and circumstances.
This rationalizes nothing. It is not God
who changes, nor what is right and wrong, but rather our understanding.
27) Then Mattathias cried out in the city,
“Let everyone who is zealous for the law and who stands by the covenant follow
Thus Mattathias becomes the spark for a movement.
28) Then he and his sons fled to the
mountains, leaving behind in the city all their possessions.
Movements often erupt without plan.
If Mattathias had intended a show-down, he would have stocked up some
hidey-hole in advance.
29) At that time many who sought
righteousness and justice went out into the wilderness to settle there, 30)
they and their children, their wives and their animals, because
misfortunes pressed so hard on them.
The wilderness where they went lies south of Jerusalem and west of the
Dead Sea, a sparsely populated region, hard to grow food in—the same region, in
fact, where the Dead Sea Scrolls were found.
Mind you, the Dead Sea Scroll writers did not approve of the Maccabees
or consider their books scripture, but apparently this rugged land abounds in
bolt-holes for dissidents of any flavor.
31) It was reported to the officers and
soldiers of the king who were in the City of David, in Jerusalem, that those
who had flouted the king’s order had gone out to secret refuges in the
It’s no use, really, to kill messengers; more always crop up in their
place, wherever there’s a story to be told, for better or for worse.
hurried out after them, and having caught up with them, camped opposite and
prepared to attack them on the sabbath. 33) The
pursuers said to them, “Enough of this! Come out and obey the king’s command,
and you will live.” 34) But they
replied, “We will not come out, nor will we obey the king’s command to profane
Keep in mind that one of the customs that they want to preserve is to do
no labor on the Sabbath.
35) Then the enemy attacked them at once. 36) But they did not retaliate; they
neither threw stones, nor blocked up their secret refuges.
COMMENTARY: Because that would
mean working on the Sabbath.
37) They said, “Let us all die in
innocence; heaven and earth are our witnesses that you destroy us unjustly.”
COMMENTARY: It is significant to me, as a Christian
Animist, that they called on Earth to bear witness.
38) So the officers and soldiers attacked them on the Sabbath,
and they died with their wives, their children and their animals, to the number
of a thousand persons.
And thus they died on their own terms, rather than become something they
39) When Mattathias and his friends heard
of it, they mourned deeply for them.
Not least because he put them up to it.
That’s a heavy responsibility, provoking much thought, as you will see.
40) They said to one another, “If we all
do as our kindred have done, and do not fight against the Gentiles for our
lives and our laws, they will soon destroy us from the earth.” 41) So on that day they came to this decision: “Let us
fight against anyone who attacks us on the Sabbath, so that we may not all die
as our kindred died in their secret refuges.”
And thus they tempered their earlier declaration that they would not
violate a single tenant of the law.
Sometimes you have to know when to make exceptions.
This set a precedent, followed by Jews today, to do what you must to survive,
even if it temporarily violates some rules, so long as you keep the intention
of preserving and passing Judaism on.
Without this understanding, there might not have been any survivors of
the Holocaust at all.
Jesus added to this precedent, extending it to
others as well as self, when he healed on the Sabbath. By no means did He make light of the Sabbath,
as others accused Him of doing, but the life and well-being of the person
healed matters more to God than even His own rules.
His response to His critics, “The Sabbath was made for Humanity; Humanity was
not made for the Sabbath” reveals God’s intention. He intended a day of rest not as some
meaningless ritual but as a life-saving break for human beings. Because our most virtuous, admirable people
can take it too far, and feel guilty about ever resting and reflecting, and
need a rule to make it okay. For that
reason God even went so far as to still Himself on the seventh day, not from
any need for rest, but to teach us how, as a mother will sometimes lay down with
a child that she wants to nap.
42) Then they were joined by a group of
Hasideans, mighty warriors of
Israel, all of them devoted to the law.
Hasideans, or Hasidim, means “Pious Ones”. These were a militant religious Jewish
sect. At first they supported the
Maccabees, and then later withdrew that support, thinking the Maccabees too
political. In any case, the Dead Sea
Scrolls preservers didn’t think much of the Hasidim, either.
43) And all those who were fleeing from
the persecutions joined them and supported them.
And that’s how revolutions begin.
44) They gathered an army and struck down
sinners in their wrath and the lawless in their anger, and the survivors fled
to the Gentiles for safety.
At this point they’re not going against the Gentile invaders so much as
the Jewish collaborators. This fits with
the post-exilic doctrine that invaders are just the hand of God’s retribution
upon those who abandon Him.
45) Mattathias and his friends went about
and tore down the pagan altars;
Because Israel and Judea were not
just places where Jews lived, but land specifically belonging to the God of
Israel and Judea, entrusted to the people but not truly owned by them.
46) they also forcibly circumcised any
uncircumcised boys whom they found in the territory of Israel.
I was appalled at the punishments inflicted on families who had their
boys circumcised, but I don’t like the reversal, either. It makes sense in the context of “eye for an
eye justice”—they forced us, so we’ll force them. But it’s still conversion by force, which
makes a bad foundation for religion.
When you have your way by force and fear you convert the adrenal glands, not
the heart and mind. Even if the
converted eventually do come to believe, that belief suffers from something
rotten in its foundation, something not-love, that eats away at the expression
of it. I have heard speculation among
some Jungians that Hitler made the headway that he did in Germany because
Germans had, in their history, been converted to Christianity not by persuasion
but by the sword, and so violence invaded their ethics and their concepts of
faith. But I would say that problems
erupted even earlier than that, in the many religious wars, pogroms,
inquisitions, witch-burnings, and other acts of violence committed supposedly
in the name of God, that convulsed Europe for centuries.
Does this have a parallel in Judea? These
events happened a few centuries before Christ.
And what He found, in his day, was a religious elite who put the letter
of the law above the compassionate spirit of the law, even as they preached
compassion. They were as punctilious as
Mattathias could ever have hoped for in obeying the least detail, but the
spirit of God’s love was not in them.
So I feel that 1 Maccabees 2 gives us an
important history lesson, but I don’t feel right about taking it as an example
of how to live.
47) They put to flight the arrogant, and
the work prospered in their hands.
COMMENTARY: “The arrogant”, presumably, being those who
felt superior for having discarded their “barbaric” eastern ways for Greek
westernization. I don’t favor them
either; don’t get me wrong. I just
wonder if there might have been some better way to confront spiritual
48) They saved the law from the hands of the Gentiles and
of the kings and did not let the sinner triumph
That I’ll give them. I shouldn’t
judge, because I doubt if I could have found a better way to do it in that time
and place. But I do know that forcible
conversion has no place among us today.
49) When the time came for Mattathias to
die, he said to his sons: “Arrogance and scorn have now grown strong; it is a
time of disaster and violent wrath.
COMMENTARY: Ambiguously, he might mean God’s wrath, his
wrath, the wrath of their enemies, or all at once.
50) Therefore, my children, be zealous for the law and
give your lives for the covenant of our ancestors.
COMMENTARY: The survival exception only applies if
survival would forward preservation of Jewish culture. If one’s death would accomplish this better,
then you do not get a “get out of martyrdom free” card.
51) “Remember the deeds that our ancestors did in their
and you shall win great
honor and an everlasting name.
COMMENTARY: As opposed to A Certain Jew.
52) Was not Abraham found faithful in trial,
was credited to him as righteousness?
COMMENTARY: Abraham’s trial was being commanded to
sacrifice his only son, only to be stopped at the last minute by the sight of a
ram trapped on thorns to sacrifice instead, taken as a sign of God that the
command was only a test. It was the
willingness that counted, not the act.
In this way Mattathias lets his sons know that martyrdom isn’t mandatory—if
God gives any sign that they may survive and still fulfill their mission, go
53) Joseph, when in distress, kept the commandment,
and he became master of
COMMENTARY: Joseph was sold into slavery by his envious
brothers, and wound up sold to Pharaoh in Egypt, where he rose in the ranks, by
staying faithful in prayer (and also by his skill at dreamwork and scholarship)
till he became the most powerful man under Pharaoh. This matters because people often thought
that if you left your community, by choice or by force, you had to take on the
religion of that people. Joseph set a
precedent of remaining a Jew even in his one-man exile.
54) Phinehas our ancestor, for his burning zeal,
received the covenant of
an everlasting priesthood.
COMMENTARY: Not a fan, as I said. But Daddy Mattathias takes this precedent to
55) Joshua, for executing his commission,
became a judge in Israel.
COMMENTARY: Joshua (also pronounced Yeshua or Jesus) took
charge of the Israelites after the death of Moses, and led the invasion of
Canaan—and married a Canaanite! (The
Bible does not mention him marrying anybody, but it’s in the Talmud.) Rahab, to be precise, a harlot of Jericho who
assisted the Israelite spies that she hid in her establishment. Some have tried to whitewash her reputation,
saying that the word translated as “harlot” could also simply mean an
innkeeper, but not only did inns at the time often do double-duty as brothels,
but Jewish tradition generally understands her to be a prostitute who, in her
conversion to Judaism (at age 50, say the scholars) made a confession that “I
have sinned by three things: my eye, my thigh, and my stomach; please pardon me
by these three things: the rope, the
window, and the wall” (Her home was in
the outermost wall, and she lowered the spies out of her window by a rope to
enable their escape.)
56) Caleb, for bearing witness before the assembly,
received an inheritance in
COMMENTARY: One of Joshua’s spies, and a leading military
figure. In many instances he quelled
dissention, cowardice, and any other obstacle to Joshua’s authority, for which
Joshua gave him a large chunk of property.
57) David, for his loyalty,
received as a heritage a
throne of eternal kingship.
COMMENTARY: At this point the line of David no longer
held a King’s throne, but descendants of King David still led various
communities. Mattathias had no idea that
his son would someday establish his own non-Davidic royal line! The internal strife this caused left Judea
ripe for Roman overthrow. This helped
make first and second Maccabees controversial books.
58) Elijah, for his burning zeal for the law,
was taken up to heaven.
COMMENTARY: In the Bible the prophet Elijah, well-known
for confronting his nation’s most powerful people about their Baal-worship, was
whisked up to Heaven instead of formally dying.
Catholics wonder, then, why Protestants find our tradition of Mary’s
body being assumed to Heaven (leaving flowers behind in her crypt) so
scandalous. It’s not in the Bible
because Mary was still alive during the writing of Acts of the Apostles, and in
fact Luke used her as a source for both that book and his own gospel.
59) Hananiah, Azariah and Mishael, for their faith,
were saved from the fire.
COMMENTARY: These three teenagers are more often referred
to by their Babylonian names, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, by which they
were known in the Book of Daniel.
Nebuchadnezzar had ordered that all in court who didn’t bow down to his
statue must be thrown into a furnace heated “seven times hotter” than normal. These youths were courtiers-in-training, but
they refused to bow and got chucked into the flames—and yet did not burn. So Nebuchadnezzar took this as a sign that he
should have them pulled out again and appointed to high offices.
60) Daniel, for his innocence,
was delivered from the
mouths of lions.
COMMENTARY: Daniel, a friend of the three above and like
them inducted into the court, was thrown to the lions for treason, but his only
“treason” was worshiping God rather than Nebuchadnezzar (which was fine until
some rivals decided to make an issue of it) and so he got thrown to the lions,
who showed no interest in devouring him.
Again, Nebuchadnezzar fished him out, letting him live to become one of
the great apocalyptic visionaries who intrigue and perplex Biblical scholars to
61) And so, consider this from generation to generation,
that none who hope in
Heaven shall fail in strength.
COMMENTARY: Strength, at least, if not life. Although Mattathias cites survival stories,
he’s realistic enough not to make guarantees that his sons will outlive their
service, only that they have that hope.
62) Do not fear the words of sinners,
for their glory ends in
corruption and worms.
63) Today exalted, tomorrow not to be found,
they have returned to
their schemes have
COMMENTARY: They do not survive the deaths of their
bodies, and their glory rots with them.
(As I’ve said before, this goes against Catholic doctrine, which teaches
that everybody has an afterlife, ending in either Heaven or Hell, the former
usually preceded by a stint in Purgatory, but a common Jewish belief of this
time was that what we’d call Purgatory burns up what’s unfit for Heaven, and if
you’re totally unfit, nothing of your soul remains by the end of a year.)
64) Children! be courageous and strong in keeping the law,
for by it you shall be
COMMENTARY: This contrasts with the promise of being honored by becoming the King's Friend.
65) “Here is your brother Simeon who I
know is a wise counselor; listen to him always, and he will be a father to you.
Thassi—Simeon the Guide.
66) And Judas Maccabeus, a mighty warrior
from his youth, shall be the leader of your army and wage the war against the
the Hammer. Much better at war than
policy. Hence Mattathias appointing
Simeon to take charge of the thinking.
67) Gather about you all who observe the
law, and avenge your people. 68) Pay
back the Gentiles what they deserve, and observe the precepts of the law.”
now they’ve got marching orders from their father, who’s about to die and
become unable to change the instructions.
69) Then he blessed them, and he was
gathered to his ancestors.
Heaven is seen as being able to be reunited with family, as opposed to those
who make an ash of themselves.
70) He died in the year one hundred and
forty-six, and was buried in the
tombs of his ancestors in Modein, and all Israel mourned him greatly.
That would be 166 BC. So this
would be as recent for Jesus as 1852 for us, if I did the math right (not
guaranteed—math is my cryptonite.) This
history was still recent enough to have significant impact on Jesus’s